RUNNING HEAD TEAM DYNAMICS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

come forwardpouring HEAD TEAM DYNAMICS - Essay ExampleSo, effective and efficient groups work provides security and loving satisfaction for customers and organization supporting individual needs and promoting communication, formally or informally. Recent trends underline the primal of guest-oriented relations and high level of cohesiveness in work groups which ensures clients satisfaction and improve service level. (Buchholz and Roth 1987).The utility and benefits of working in teams are joined actions of all team members and an opportunity to work on entangled problems and solutions. For this reason, team work plays a crucial role as it is concerned with provision of services for the various client population. Design of a team and effective leader can be seen only as tools for providing effective support. Neither a group work nor a leader in isolation cannot plug effective work of modern organizations. Group work is a complex notion which depends upon different strategies an d methods. advance(a) organizations deal socially and economically with diverse settings. The class-based approach has a tendency to foster autonomy of client population. ... (Dickson and Hargie 2003). The main challenge of team work is effective communication and coordination of all team members, motivation and rewards. In general, a work team can be defined as a group of individuals working interdependently to solve problems or accomplish tasks. Teams are a powerful design option for organizations that hope to twin the challenges of increased global competition, improve output quality, and address the social needs of the ever-changing global workforce. However, the success or failure of work teams in multinational organizations will depend largely on communication. potent communication requires that HR practiti wholenessrs adapt key assumptions about motivation, structure, and accountability. Adapted assumptions must support lateral thinking, collaboration, mutuality, a focus on process, permeable boundaries, and mutual responsibility. Following LaFasto and Larsen (2001) the key ingredients for successful teamwork are openness, supportiveness, action taste and personal style (p. 5). Work teams are most effective when there is high task interdependence or a high degree of coordination and collaboration required between team members to accomplish tasks. Thus, a group of insurance sales agents who are geographically dispersed and have little interaction with one another to carry out their tasks would most likely be an inappropriate context in which to action teams. The agents would probably see such an effort as an empty, poorly developed strategy designed to trespass on a management fad. Work teams are also more appropriate when the tasks that their members carry out are complex and well designed (Dickson and